AI debate for founders: a board of advisors for startup decisions
Early-stage founders make company-defining calls — pricing, pivot, first hire, raise now or later — with the least access to experienced pushback. Advisors are busy, co-founders share your biases, and a single AI chat mostly tells you your idea is great.
LLM Debate Council is the cheapest honest room you can assemble: models from Groq, Anthropic, Google and xAI argue your decision from different angles, an opponent attacks it on purpose, the market claims get fact-checked, and you leave with a reasoned verdict — not applause.
The decisions founders actually run through it
Anything with a fork in it works: 'raise a seed round now or bootstrap another six months?', 'launch in one country deeply or five countries thin?', '$29 flat or usage-based pricing?'. Frame it as a question, add the constraints that matter (runway, team size, traction), pick 3–5 agents and run Debate mode.
- Pricing and packaging → Debate with the Opponent toggle on
- Pitch deck narrative → Stress Test (investors' objections, pre-heard)
- Idea validation → Socratic mode to expose the fuzzy parts
- Naming, positioning, GTM ideas → Brainstorm
- Market size and competitor claims → fact-check pass with sources
An opponent you can't demoralize
The scarcest resource for a founder is disagreement. The Opponent toggle forces one model to argue the weaker side of your plan as convincingly as it can — and ends with the single strongest argument against its own assigned position, so you get steelman objections, not strawmen.
Stress Test mode goes further for launches and decks: one agent defends, the others attack from fixed angles (cost, legal, scalability, UX, security), producing a ranked list of vulnerabilities with mitigations.
Reality-check the numbers before an investor does
TAM figures, churn benchmarks, competitor pricing — any number quoted in the debate goes through claim-by-claim verification against live web sources: VERIFIED, DISPUTED or FALSE. Better to find out in a $0.05 debate than in a partner meeting.
Cost that fits a pre-seed budget
Every plan includes built-in models and monthly credits, so you can start with no keys and no setup; the subscription is $0–20/month. Optionally plug in your own API keys and you pay the provider directly, spending 0 credits (Groq even has a free API tier). The free tier gives 5 debates a month with up to 2 agents; Pro adds up to 10 agents, the anonymous Council mode and PDF/DOCX export for sharing verdicts with co-founders or investors.
FAQ
Will the models just tell me my startup idea is good?
Not if you configure the room: turn on the Opponent, use Stress Test, or run Council mode where models rank answers anonymously. The formats are designed to prevent the polite consensus a single chat gives you.
Is my idea safe to discuss?
Whether you use the built-in models or your own API keys, your ideas aren't used to train the Council and aren't visible to other users; with your own keys, requests go directly to the providers you chose on your own account.
How long does a decision take?
A 3-agent debate with fact-checking typically finishes in a few minutes, streamed live so you can watch positions form — or jump in mid-debate with your own directive.
Free tier · bring your own API keys · 15 languages